The DYS 447 = 24, DYS
576 = 17 Group
MacLochlainn of Tirconnell
25 marker test
| The following table shows the genetic distance of our large group of McLaughlins and one Bennett (adopted). All match the McLaughlin modal except for 84149, who has only the DYS 447 = 24 part of the modal. Genetic distance in the group runs from 0 (exact match) to 5, with the great majority at 1 or 2 GD. |
| Genetic Distance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ID | P 8 5 3 Z |
C 5 4 A S |
W 9 T P C |
s 1 0 0 1 |
Y X 3 9 S |
K A 9 R Y |
6 7 9 1 2 |
9 F 7 N 8 |
8 4 1 4 9 |
2 B Z V G |
Q 7 K M X |
W 7 F K Y |
3 6 3 7 0 |
N K 3 A G |
R B Z 7 M |
|||||||||||||
| P853Z | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| C54AS | 2 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| W9TPC | 2 | 4 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| s1001 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| YX39S | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| KA9RY | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| 67912 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| 9F7N8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| 84149 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| 2BZVG | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Q7KMX | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| W7FKY | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| 36370 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||
| NK3AG | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| RBZ7M | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 25 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Infinite allele mutation model is used
- Values on the diagonal indicate number of markers tested |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The guidelines on genetic distance on the FTDNA site state that a genetic distance of 4 normally means you aren't related, unless you match an "inbetweener" or the "center" of the group. That does appear to be the case in our McLaughlin group. Almost everyone in this group match both 67912 and 36370 at a genetic distance of 1 or 2. The Outliers match others in this group by at most a genetic distance of 2, even though they may be 4 or 5 GD away from other members. |
FTDNA Guidelines
| 4 | Not Related | 21/25 is too far off to be considered related. Unlikely but vaguely possible that the rule for ONLY Probably Not Related applies. It is important to determine what set of results (or haplotype) most typifies 'most' members of the group you are close to matching. You may be 21/25 with an individual, but 23/25 with the center (most common) of the group, and your potential relatedness to him is through the center of the group. |
| Time to most recent common Ancestor (TMRCA) estimates place most of the group with a common ancestor ranging from 1297 AD. to 1557 AD. The outliers in the group have dates of 357 to 557 AD. These earlier dates do not seem to be reliable. |
| Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor (Years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ID | P 8 5 3 Z |
C 5 4 A S |
W 9 T P C |
s 1 0 0 1 |
Y X 3 9 S |
K A 9 R Y |
6 7 9 1 2 |
9 F 7 N 8 |
8 4 1 4 9 |
2 B Z V G |
Q 7 K M X |
W 7 F K Y |
3 6 3 7 0 |
N K 3 A G |
R B Z 7 M |
|||||
| P853Z | 25 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 720 | |||||
| C54AS | 720 | 25 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 1020 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 2100 | 1020 | 1650 | 1350 | |||||
| W9TPC | 720 | 1350 | 25 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 1020 | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 1350 | 900 | 1020 | 1650 | 1350 | |||||
| s1001 | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 25 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| YX39S | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 720 | 25 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 1470 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| KA9RY | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 720 | 720 | 25 | 450 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 1470 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| 67912 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 25 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 900 | 180 | 720 | 720 | |||||
| 9F7N8 | 720 | 1350 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 25 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| 84149 | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 25 | 180 | 180 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| 2BZVG | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 180 | 25 | 180 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| Q7KMX | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 720 | 720 | 720 | 450 | 720 | 180 | 180 | 25 | 900 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | |||||
| W7FKY | 900 | 2100 | 900 | 900 | 1470 | 1470 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 | 16 | 900 | 900 | 1470 | |||||
| 36370 | 450 | 1020 | 1020 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 180 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 450 | 900 | 25 | 720 | 720 | |||||
| NK3AG | 1020 | 1650 | 1650 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 720 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 900 | 720 | 25 | 1350 | |||||
| RBZ7M | 720 | 1350 | 1350 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 720 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 1020 | 1470 | 720 | 1350 | 25 | |||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| - Infinite allele mutation model is used
- Average mutation rate varies: 0.0018 to 0.0023 rates derived by Doug McDonald from the Sorenson database - Values on the diagonal indicate number of markers tested - Probability is 50% that the TMRCA is no longer than indicated - Average generaton: 30 years |
||||||||||||||||||||
MacLochlainn of Tirconnell Dates
| The first to bear the surname
MacLochlainn in Donegal was Ardgar MacLochlainn, the King
of Aileach, who died in 1064 A.D. He was literally the
"son of Lochlan". Beyond this we can't say
much. We don't know the exact ancestry of Lochlan with
certainty. Nor do we know if he had other sons than
Ardgar. His descendants are referred to in the annals as
both O'Lochlainn and MacLochlainn until finally
MacLochlainn became the norm. But as far as we know all
McLaughlins today descended from the MacLochlainn of
Donegal sept are descended from Ardgar MacLochlainn. 1051 [AU] Mac Lochlainn was expelled from the kingship of Telach-og, and Aedh Ua Ferghail was made king. 1064 [AU] Airdgar Mac Lochlainn, king of Aileach, died in Telach-og and was buried in Ard-Macha, in the mausoleum of the kings." According to the O'Clery Book of Genealogies, all McLaughlins of Donegal descend from Domhnall MacLochlainn, the King of the Cenel Eoghain, slain in 1241 at the Battle of Caim Eirge. 1241 [AU] The battle of Cam-eirghi was given by Brian O'Neill and Mael-Sechlainn O'Domnaill, king of Cenel-Conaill, to Domnall Mag Lochlainn, namely to the King of Tir-Eogain, so that Domnall Mag Lochlainn was killed therein and ten of his own tribe around him and all the chiefs of Cenel-Eogain and many other good persons likewise. And the kingship was taken by Brian O'Neill after him. This was a bloody battle. Most of the commentators state that most of Domhnall MacLochlainn's derbfine were slain, so the idea that all McLaughlins living in the late 1500s (when the O'Clery genealogies may have been first composed) are descended from him is at least plausible. Some of the very early dates for TMRCA would appear to contradict the genealogies though. The O'Clery Genealogies also show three groups of McLaughlins that descend from this line. The genealogies themselves are corrupt and there is no agreement as to the correct interpretation. One version shows each group descending from a common ancestor sometime in the early 15th century. In the genealogies, the groups are headed by Aibhne, from whom descended the MacLochlainns of Redcastle; Owen 'the official,' from whom most likely descend the MacLochlainns of Derry; and The Eoghanacht, from whom descend the MacLochlainns of Whitecastle. The last known McLaughlin chief of sept was Brian oge McLaughlin in the line of the Eoghanacht; but English records of the time also mention Hugh Carrach McLaughlin as chief (from the line of Aibhne). Although the subsequent history of Brian oge's family is traced in Amy Young's "Inishowen" (lifted verbatim from an earlier work by Magtochair) no modernday descendant has ever been found. We therefore have no one to test that might give us a clue as to the different DNA branches of the sept. |